data for politics #32: Give Smart 4, Eight Progressive Women in Pivotal Races

Friends,

Half a million dollars. We still can’t believe it. You gave more than half a million dollars to strategically chosen state legislative candidates who could be the difference between Democratic and Republican control over the lives of millions of people.

Your money isn’t lining the pockets of consultants, or contributing to a television air war of attrition. Most of it goes to voter contact, or is the difference between a candidate running a radio/cable ad or not at all.  

And while Sheldon Adelson is out here cutting $25 million checks to Mitch McConnell, we still haven’t seen any indication that Republicans know how to fight back against these sudden small infusions of grassroots donor money.

So we’re going put together a few more slates of amazing Democrats who could help flip state legislatures. Today, we’re going to focus on a group of eight women who could decide control of  Pennsylvania, Texas, Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida, Minnesota and Iowa.

As with before, these races were carefully vetted to ensure your money goes as far as possible.

So here at Data For Progress we’re making a simple request - spend $80 across these eight candidates. We’ve set up an ActBlue page for you to make those donations, and you can find more about each of the candidates below. We’re calling it our Give Smart initiative. No portion of the contributions to Give Smart goes to Data for Progress. All the money supports candidates.

Read More

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
data for politics #31: Give Smart 3, LaunchProgress

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
data for politics #30: Give Smart 2, EveryDistrict

Friends,

It’s hard to write right now because we’re at a loss for words.

We thought that if we were lucky we’d raise maybe $20,000 for our slate of eight candidates who could flip eight state legislatures blue. But as we’re writing this on Wednesday night, barely 36 hours after the fundraiser started, that number stands at $160,000 and counting.  That’s $20,000 per candidate.

We knew that you cared, we knew that you were generous, we just didn’t know that you cared so much and could be so generous.

We’re also so glad that we showed the left is willing to Give Smart. That our movement understands that we have the greatest impact when we build the party from the ground up.  That we’re crafty enough to find the places where the Koch money tree and other reactionaries are weakest. Together, we can do this.

And by Giving Smart we can make the biggest impact. $20,000 might get you 10 ads on TV in Minneapolis. But look at what Kristin Bahner, running for a seat in the suburb of Maple Grove, is going to do with her money:

Read More

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
data for politics #29: Give Smart

Friends,

Democrats have been breaking fundraising records all year.  With elections just three weeks away you probably want to donate, but it’s hard to tell whether a candidate really needs your money. That’s why we want you to Give Smart.

Read More

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
data for politics #28: Republican Senators are Less Sensitive to their General Electorates

By Jon Green (@_Jon_Green)

At various points during the Trump administration, progressive activists have trained their focus on key “swing” Republican senators who are perceived to be open to opposing key elements of the Republican policy agenda. This dynamic was present in full force last week during the culmination of the nominating process for Brett Kavanaugh. There were a variety of reasons why one might expect a handful of Republican senators’ votes to have been on the table during this nomination fight, and yet Kavanaugh’s nomination proceeded almost entirely on party lines. The reasons why various Republicans may have opposed Kavanaugh are as follows:

Read More

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
data for politics #27: Same Day Registration Can Increase Voter Turnout

By Charlotte Hill (@hill_charlotte) and Jake Grumbach (@JakeMGrumbach)

Voting reform is on the map in the 2018 elections. At least six states are considering updating how people register to vote, either through legislative action or ballot initiative. Some of these reforms, like Florida’s felon re-enfranchisement initiative, focus on boosting registration and turnout among specific populations; others, like a new Michigan ballot initiative, make it easier for people to register and cast a ballot on the same day.

Read More

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
data for politics #26: Florida Primaries

By Kevin Morris (@ktnmorris)

Five hundred and thirty-seven.

That, of course, was George W. Bush’s margin of victory over Al Gore in Florida in the 2000 presidential election. The race in Florida and the Supreme Court’s subsequent bequeathment of the presidency to Bush the Second altered the course of American politics and policy over the past two decades, and its echoes will continue for a long time to come.

More recently, Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton by 1.2 percent in 2016, again playing an outsized role in the up-fucking of the United States.

Read More

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
data for politics #25: What the Hell is Happening in DC?

By Kevin Morris (@ktnmorris)

It’s October now, and something evil is afoot.

In June, residents of Washington, DC, voted to end the loophole that allowed employers to pay tipped workers (like waiters and bartenders) less than other employees. In an industry rife with abuse, this was considered a big win. And it was passed by a reasonably large margin - 53 percent of voters approved the initiative.

Read More
Guest UserWorkers Rights

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
data demystified #4: How liberals and conservatives talk about progressive issues

By: Kevin Reuning (@KevinReuning)

Partisanship and political ideologies do not just shape how people vote. Ideology and partisanship dictate how individuals view political issues, the values they emphasize and the way they understand how values connect to issues. It is critical then, when talking about new political issues, to examine how voters understand those issues. In this post we are going to look at why voters say they support or oppose a variety of progressive issues, and how liberals and conservatives frame that support differently.

Read More
Guest UserEducation, Democracy

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
data for politics #24: The IDC Challengers and Cynthia Nixon

By Kevin Morris (@ktnmorris)

Over here at Data for Progress, we’re still celebrating the imminent demise of the Independent Democratic Caucus. On September 13, voters in New York City roundly defeated five of the six members of the IDC facing reelection bids. There’s already talk about the progressive legislation that might finally start making its way through Albany with the arrival of a true Democratic majority in the state senate - improved access to the ballot, stricter campaign finance laws, stronger rent regulation, and more.

Read More
Guest UserElections

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
data for politics #23: Analyzing How Americans Think About Free College

By Hannah Gorman (@SanFranHan)

The polling Data for Progress shared on the New Progressive Agenda showed an exciting trend: support for progressive policies  cuts across party, ideology, and 2016 presidential choices. Reading through the results, I wondered if there were differences in how these groups thought about the policies presented, given the sharp divisions in debate we see elsewhere. I dug into the open ended text responses from the survey to see if they shed light on why people respond to the policy the way they do.

Read More
Guest UserEducation, Guest Writers

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
data for politics #22: What happened in the NY-14?

By Kevin Morris (@ktnmorris)

In June, the NY-14 became perhaps the most famous congressional district in the country. On June 26th, 28 year-old Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez bested Joe Crowley in the district’s federal primary. Ocasio-Cortez ran on an unabashedly progressive platform, calling for Medicare for all, the abolishment of ICE, and a federal jobs guarantee. She has been heralded as the face of the insurgent left, demonstrating the potency of progressive policy among the Democratic base.

So what the hell happened on September 13?

Read More
Guest UserElections

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required